Former duke chased by alleged stalker, court hears

Former Duke Faces Court Over Alleged Stalking Incident Near Royal Residence

Confrontation Captured in Witness Statement

Constantvpn.com – A legal proceeding has revealed new details about a tense encounter between Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and a man who allegedly pursued him while wearing a face covering. The former duke recounted how he found himself in a direct confrontation with an individual who then chased after his vehicle during a routine walk with his dogs near his Norfolk property.

The incident occurred on the sixth day of May, when Mountbatten-Windsor was out exercising his pets. According to court documents, Alex Jenkinson, a 39-year-old resident of Stowmarket in Suffolk, is now facing accusations that his actions caused the former duke to “fear unlawful violence.” Suffolk Police authorities are currently pursuing a civil Stalking Protection Order against Jenkinson as part of ongoing legal proceedings.

Details of the Face-to-Face Encounter

Westminster Magistrates’ Court heard portions of Mountbatten-Windsor’s formal witness statement, which will serve as a central piece of evidence in both the criminal and civil cases. Deputy Chief Magistrate Tan Ikram read excerpts from the statement describing how the situation unfolded.

The former duke explained that he initially noticed a vehicle he believed belonged to press photographers. He and his security team proceeded to drive past this car. At that moment, the situation changed dramatically.

“I then saw a loose dog running towards him. Then he realised who I was and began to sprint after my vehicle.”

Mountbatten-Windsor provided a detailed description of the man, noting that he appeared “out-of-place” and was wearing a balaclava face covering. The statement also captured the moment when the individual recognized the former duke and immediately began running after the vehicle.

Jenkinson’s Absence and Personal Circumstances

The court hearing proceeded without Jenkinson present, as he was prevented from entering the building while accompanied by his dog. His legal representative, Claire Howell, explained to Judge Ikram that the animal serves as a support companion for her client.

Howell noted that Jenkinson has Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and is currently experiencing homelessness, which is why he requires his dog’s presence. She acknowledged that she does not possess formal documentation to verify either his medical condition or the necessity of the support animal, but emphasized the practical importance of the dog to her client’s wellbeing.

Legal Charges and Bail Conditions

Jenkinson has entered a not guilty plea to the public order offence involving Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Additionally, he has contested a separate charge related to using threatening, abusive, or insulting words or behaviour with the intention of causing fear or provoking unlawful violence against another individual, Stephen Terry, in King’s Lynn on the fifth of May.

The defendant is also challenging the proposed Stalking Protection Order. Under current conditional bail terms, Jenkinson must maintain distance from several significant royal properties, including Sandringham, Buckingham Palace, Balmoral, Windsor, and Highgrove. He is additionally prohibited from attempting to contact Mountbatten-Windsor through any means, whether directly or indirectly, and must not approach the former duke or enter the county of Norfolk.

What Comes Next

The trial is scheduled to commence on the twenty-first of December. The Stalking Protection Order, if granted, would provide additional civil protections beyond the criminal charges. Such orders typically include restrictions on proximity, communication, and movement, designed to prevent further incidents and provide peace of mind for the protected individual.

The case highlights the intersection of royal life and ordinary legal processes, as members of the extended royal family navigate the same court systems as other citizens when disputes arise. The outcome of these proceedings will determine not only Jenkinson’s legal standing but also the scope of future restrictions placed upon him.