Szoboszlai’s Stoppage-Time Penalty Keeps Liverpool’s Season Alive After a Turbulent St James’ Park Night
Constantvpn.com – A 99th-minute spot-kick by Dominik Szoboszlai dragged Liverpool back from the brink of a second consecutive opening-weekend defeat at Newcastle United, producing a 2-2 draw that left the Merseyside club with a point but very little comfort. The result, secured in front of a raucous St James’ Park crowd, meant Liverpool avoided what would have been their first opening-day loss since the 2012-13 campaign. Yet the manner of the escape — trailing twice before a final-minute penalty — underscored how much work Andoni Iraola’s new-look squad still requires before the season truly gets under way.
The echoes of last August were impossible to ignore. Twelve months earlier, Rio Ngumoha had produced a stunning 100th-minute strike to seal a win at this very ground. This time, the late drama carried a very different emotional weight. Where last year’s finish sparked pure elation, Szoboszlai’s conversion felt like a narrow reprieve rather than a triumph. Liverpool had been undone twice by Newcastle’s counter-attacking thrusts, and the second goal — scored by Joe Willock to make it 2-1 — exposed a structural vulnerability that Iraola will need to address before the next fixture.
Iraola Claims the Point Was Earned
Speaking after the final whistle, the Spanish manager insisted his players had never stopped pushing and that the draw reflected the quality of their effort across 90-plus minutes.
“It’s probably not the result you want when you come in before the game but we definitely deserve this point and even more. The team has never given up and we’ve recovered one point and probably the taste is better because we score in the last minute.”
Iraola, who has stated a preference for conducting his post-match debrief on the day following a fixture rather than immediately after the final whistle, offered a more measured assessment of the performance. He acknowledged the positives — the resilience, the late penalty, the individual moments of quality — while implicitly conceding that the defensive lapses and creative sterility of the first hour were unacceptable for a squad expected to challenge for a top-four finish.
The Wirtz and Isak Question
Two of Liverpool’s most expensive summer acquisitions were under the microscope from the first whistle. Florian Wirtz, brought in for a nine-figure fee, began the match with reasonable intent but was substituted just past the 60th minute after Newcastle’s second goal had put them 2-1 ahead. Alexander Isak, the Swedish striker whose drawn-out transfer saga from Newcastle concluded last September, received a chorus of boos every time he touched the ball. He registered 28 touches and appeared motivated, yet squandered a clear-cut second-half chance of the sort he would have routinely buried during his time at St James’ Park.
Both players will understand that the scrutiny will intensify. Their combined output, their on-pitch connection, and their ability to generate creative threat must improve rapidly if Liverpool are to fulfil the ambitions attached to their combined transfer fees.
“You’re expecting Liverpool to get top four this season at least but they didn’t look like a top four team today. There are more players to come in, so you can’t make a real decision on how their season is going to go. There’s a definite lack of creativity and somehow they must get the best out of Florian Wirtz and Alexander Isak because you certainly didn’t get the best out of them today.”
Those remarks came from Pat Nevin, the former Scotland winger, who offered a blunt external perspective on what the match revealed about Liverpool’s current attacking shape.
Squad Depth and the Transfer Window
The most pressing structural issue exposed by the Newcastle match was one of sheer numbers. Once Victor Munoz and Alexis Mac Allister entered the game in the 63rd minute, Iraola’s remaining bench comprised Giorgi Mamardashvili, Ronald Araujo, Wataru Endo, Kostas Tsimikas, Trey Nyoni, James McConnell, and Lewis Koumas. That thinness of options left the manager with limited tactical flexibility in a match that demanded it.
The Cody Gakpo situation looms large as the transfer window approaches its final week. The Dutchman was Liverpool’s standout performer at Newcastle, producing a goal of considerable quality, yet his future at the club remains uncertain. Should Iraola secure two additional attacking signings, Gakpo’s position could become untenable. Liverpool have been linked with Paris Saint-Germain’s Bradley Barcola and Ibrahim Mbaye, and have had two bids turned down for Brighton’s Yankuba Minteh.
Munoz himself offered a glimmer of future promise on his Liverpool debut, coming off the bench to win the decisive late penalty after replacing Ngumoha. The Spanish forward’s composure in that moment suggested a player capable of contributing at the highest level, though his long-term role will depend on how Iraola’s attacking plans evolve.
Defensive Fragility and the Ngumoha Experiment
Both goals conceded came via Newcastle’s counter-attack, with full-backs Milos Kerkez and Jeremie Frimpong caught out of position on each occasion. The absence of a dedicated defensive midfielder was equally apparent; Iraola was forced to slot Mac Allister in front of the back four after Willock’s goal, a stopgap that highlighted the positional gap in midfield.
Statistically, the vulnerability is not new. Since the start of last season, Liverpool have conceded more goals from fast breaks across all competitions than any other Premier League side — nine in total. That figure will feature prominently in Iraola’s analytical review.
The Ngumoha episode added another layer of complexity. The English teenager, who will turn 18 next week, has operated on the left throughout his youth career. Deployed on the right at Newcastle, he struggled to influence the game and was substituted after just over an hour. Iraola has expressed a clear desire for his wide players to operate interchangeably on both flanks, but whether that philosophy persists once additional attackers arrive remains an open question.
A Start, Not a Verdict
For all the concerns the match surfaced, the draw itself will serve as a morale stabiliser for a squad navigating a managerial transition. Iraola’s preference for delayed debriefs suggests he will spend the following day dissecting the performance in detail, identifying what worked, what did not, and what must change before the next competitive fixture. The point rescued in the dying seconds buys time. What it does not buy is an excuse for the creative and defensive deficiencies that a top-four-calibre squad cannot afford to carry into September.
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Relief for Iraola but Liverpool have?
Relief for Iraola but Liverpool have is the main topic of this guide. The article explains the context, practical details, and next steps readers should understand.
Why does Relief for Iraola but Liverpool have matter?
Relief for Iraola but Liverpool have matters because readers are looking for a useful answer, not just a short summary. Good content should match search intent and help them decide what to do next.









