Video that police denied existed shows woman pinned down
Video that police denied existed shows woman pinned down
that police denied existed shows woman – Northamptonshire Police faced a significant backlash after a body-worn video of Nadine Buzzard-Quashie’s arrest was revealed to have been withheld from a court. The footage, which the police initially claimed did not exist, has now been shared exclusively with the BBC and captures the moment officers in the county threw metal spikes in front of her car and forced her to the ground. The video, Buzzard-Quashie says, shows her face pressed into stinging nettles as part of the encounter, which she describes as degrading. This incident led to the Chief Constable of Northamptonshire, Ivan Balhatchet, being found guilty of contempt of court in November and fined £50,000 for failing to release the body-worn videos to her.
The Controversial Arrest Video
The video, obtained by the BBC, depicts the arrest of Buzzard-Quashie following a welfare concern. Officers are seen surrounding her car, deploying a spike strip to halt her progress, and then pinning her to the ground. The footage also includes a moment where she is held in a position that leaves her vulnerable, with her face exposed to stinging nettles. This visual evidence has sparked questions about the use of force and the transparency of the police department. The video’s existence was initially denied by the officers, but its release has forced a reevaluation of their actions during the arrest.
A Complex Legal Journey
Buzzard-Quashie, a 43-year-old woman from west London and founder of a corporate gifting company, has described the incident as part of her “David and Goliath battle.” Her story gained attention when she raised concerns about the police’s handling of video data. Earlier in 2021, she had been detained by the Metropolitan Police for 17 hours at Hammersmith police station, following an arrest on suspicion of sending malicious communications. This occurred after she posted racist messages she had received from former acquaintances on Instagram. The case against her was eventually dropped, but she remained unsettled by the treatment she received.
Buzzard-Quashie had previously requested the release of CCTV footage from her detention by the Met. The footage, which arrived on DVD on 24 August, included highly intrusive scenes of her using a custody toilet. However, she discovered that the Met had retained and downloaded unpixelated versions of the footage without her knowledge. Her legal team, Bindmans, labeled the material as “grossly intrusive,” highlighting its graphic depiction of her genitalia. This revelation left her feeling betrayed and contributed to a mental health crisis.
After reporting the incident to London’s Mayor, Sir Sadiq Khan, and the then Met Police commissioner, Dame Cressida Dick, Buzzard-Quashie found herself in a state of confusion and physical discomfort. On 2 September 2021, she drove away from her home, leaving her phone turned off to avoid further police contact. The footage from the Met was stored in a brown envelope in the boot of her Range Rover, a vehicle she used to travel from west London to Northampton. The following day, she awoke in her car near Althorp House, the burial site of Diana, Princess of Wales, feeling disoriented and in pain.
The Police Encounter
While en route, she was discovered by a member of the public who called an ambulance. However, during the ambulance ride, she borrowed a paramedic’s phone to contact her family and learned they had reported her missing. Despite this, she left the hospital before being admitted, fearing another confrontation with the police. She returned to her car, which was parked at the entrance of Althorp House, and encountered a police officer who had tracked her down. The officer stated there was a concern for her welfare, but Buzzard-Quashie insisted she did not want to engage in conversation and believed she was not obligated to stay.
According to the police body-worn video, Buzzard-Quashie was followed for 16 minutes by two police vehicles, with no attempt to use sirens or blue lights to signal her. A spike strip was deployed in front of her car, forcing her to stop. The pursuit log, revealed by the BBC, indicates that a police helicopter was on standby, and armed response units were prepared to deploy if she had reached the M1 motorway. This escalation of force, she claims, suggested an intent to seize the CCTV footage she was carrying.
Police Communication and Claims
Radio logs shared with the BBC reveal that Met officers were in regular contact with their Northamptonshire counterparts, emphasizing the urgency of capturing Buzzard-Quashie. They reportedly described her as “lacking capacity” and “indicating she would try [to kill herself].” These statements have raised concerns about the police’s judgment in the situation and whether her actions were accurately assessed. The footage from the Met, which was removed without her consent, has become a focal point of her legal challenge, highlighting the potential misuse of video data.
Buzzard-Quashie’s account of the incident underscores the broader implications of police transparency. Her experience with the Northamptonshire Police, who initially denied the body-worn video’s existence, has led her to question the integrity of the system. The combined actions of both forces—denying evidence, removing her CCTV, and deploying force in a potentially aggressive manner—have created a narrative of institutional resistance. Despite the controversy, the police have maintained that the use of force was lawful, citing the concern for her welfare as justification.
Quotes from the Woman at the Center of the Storm
“I don’t do well with injustice,” says Buzzard-Quashie, who has now spoken publicly about the ordeal. “Something was seriously wrong. I’m thinking they want the [CCTV] footage in the back of my car.”
The BBC has confirmed the existence of the footage, which Buzzard-Quashie believes exposes the police’s tendency to suppress evidence. Her case has drawn attention to the importance of video data in legal proceedings and the potential for misuse. With ongoing damages claims exceeding £3m, both police forces have chosen to remain silent, leaving the public to speculate about the extent of their involvement in the incident.
Buzzard-Quashie’s story not only highlights her personal struggle but also raises broader questions about the accountability of law enforcement. The combination of her previous experience with the Met and the recent events in Northamptonshire has placed her in a unique position of advocating for transparency. Her actions, including the decision to drive away from her home, have become symbolic of her fight against perceived injustice, even as she faces the weight of legal battles and public scrutiny.