Iran denies Trump’s claim that new talks will begin on Monday
Iran Disputes Trump’s Assertion Regarding Monday Negotiations
Constantvpn.com – Following President Donald Trump’s announcement that he had suspended what he described as “massive” military strikes against Iran, Tehran has officially rejected the claim that fresh diplomatic discussions are set to commence on Monday. The US leader made his remarks while aboard Air Force One on Sunday, indicating that negotiations would start the following afternoon. He suggested that Iranian officials were aware of the impending operation because they observed its development.
We’re talking to them in the form of a negotiation. It begins tomorrow afternoon.
Earlier in the day, Trump had shared his perspective on Truth Social, noting that both Iran and various Middle Eastern allies had requested he pause the planned attacks. According to the president, the fundamental parameters of an agreement had already been established. However, Iran’s foreign ministry issued a statement on Monday clarifying that no talks with Washington were underway, nor were any planned.
Spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei explained that Tehran was instead working through Oman to achieve “an understanding over a path to ensure the security of shipping passage through the Strait of Hormuz.” Previous rounds of dialogue between the two nations have typically been mediated by third parties.
Regional Allies Influence Decision
Trump emphasized that several key partners had strongly advised against weekend military action. Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, along with representatives from the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, all urged restraint. The president stated that these allies believed an agreement was within reach.
We were all set to go. The reason they asked is [that] they think there’s a deal. There’s a deal on Hormuz, and there will be a deal on the nuclear.
When pressed about whether he intended to target Iranian energy facilities—a move some international legal experts have characterized as potentially constituting a war crime—Trump declined to provide a definitive answer. He simply noted that the United States remained prepared to act whenever necessary, adding that he was not seeking to cause unnecessary casualties.
Market and Diplomatic Reactions
Financial markets responded positively to Trump’s announcement. Brent Crude oil prices dropped by 4.5% to reach $83.98 (£62.26) during Asian trading on Monday. American-traded oil similarly declined by 4.6%, settling at $80.74 (£59.85). Energy costs have experienced considerable volatility since hostilities began on February 28, as traders continuously assessed disruptions to maritime shipping routes. Approximately twenty percent of global crude oil and liquefied natural gas typically passes through the strategic waterway.
Iran’s semi-official Mehr news agency firmly rejected Trump’s narrative, asserting that Tehran had not requested a pause in military operations. The agency characterized the president’s statements as “nothing but a new lie.”
Iran’s acting Defence Minister Majid Ibn al-Reza previously commented that the nation considers all threats from opposing forces as “real and credible,” regardless of whether they represent genuine danger or psychological tactics. He emphasized that Iran would neither be surprised nor remain inactive in response to external pressures.
Historical Context and Domestic Concerns
Trump has a pattern of issuing dramatic warnings to Tehran before later insisting that diplomatic solutions deserve consideration. On Saturday, he declared that the United States was “locked and loaded and ready to go against the Islamic Republic of Iran, at levels of Military Terror, Strength, and Power not seen since World War II.” Nevertheless, he framed the cancellation of the attack as beneficial for global stability and Iran’s continued prosperity.
I think there’s a deal.
On April 7, the president had warned that “a whole civilisation will die tonight” if Iran failed to participate in peace discussions. At that time, he also threatened to dismantle civilian infrastructure and power generation facilities. Those threats ultimately led to historic in-person negotiations in Pakistan, orchestrated by Vice-President JD Vance, though no agreement emerged from those discussions.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration has largely ignored polling data indicating that both the war and its economic consequences are unpopular among American voters, including many Republicans. Surveys revealing significant dissatisfaction with how the conflict has been managed have caused concern among conservative strategists as the November midterm elections approach.
Trump also mentioned that he had not specified where Monday’s talks would take place or exactly which participants would attend. He declined to set a firm deadline for reaching an agreement with Tehran, simply stating, “We’ll just see how it is.”
The president further noted that the planned strikes would have represented “the biggest attack since World War Two” and potentially undermined prospects for ending the months-long conflict through diplomacy.
With additional reporting from Peter Hoskins.
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Iran denies Trump s claim that?
Iran denies Trump s claim that is the main topic of this guide. The article explains the context, practical details, and next steps readers should understand.
Why does Iran denies Trump s claim that matter?
Iran denies Trump s claim that matters because readers are looking for a useful answer, not just a short summary. Good content should match search intent and help them decide what to do next.
