Controversy Intensifies Over Potential Culling of Dartmoor Hill Ponies

Row over potential cull of Dartmoor – A growing debate has erupted regarding the possible culling of Dartmoor hill ponies, with environmental advocates accusing Natural England of risking the survival of the critically endangered breed through its new conservation strategies. The issue has sparked concern among local stakeholders, who fear that the agency’s plan to reduce livestock grazing on the moor’s commons could result in the removal—likely through culling—of up to 90% of the pony population. Opponents argue that this approach could have long-term consequences for the ecological balance of the region, as well as for the cultural heritage tied to these animals.

Conservation Plans Spark Outcry

Under the latest contracts with the government’s conservation agency, Natural England has proposed a shift in grazing practices that may prioritize other livestock species over the hill ponies. This has led to criticism from groups like the Dartmoor Hill Pony Association (DHPA), which warns that the change could force commoners—those with the right to graze animals on the moor—to abandon the ponies in favor of commercially viable options such as sheep and cattle. Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the Conservative Party, has condemned the plan as “total madness,” joining a petition to halt the culling.

Badenoch’s remarks highlight the political dimension of the dispute, framing the decision as an example of bureaucratic overreach. She accused Natural England of acting as an “unaccountable quango” and criticized the government for allowing the cull to proceed. “Keir Starmer is on his way to making his last acts in office the shameful under-funding of our military and the mass slaughter of Dartmoor ponies,” she said in a statement. The petition, which has gained traction among local residents and conservationists, seeks to preserve the ponies’ traditional role in the landscape.

Historical Context and Population Decline

Dartmoor hill ponies have inhabited the area for over 4,500 years, making them a key part of the region’s natural and cultural identity. However, their numbers have significantly dwindled, dropping from an estimated 6,000 individuals 25 years ago to fewer than 1,000 today. This decline has been attributed to a combination of habitat changes and shifting land management priorities. Natural England maintains that its goal is to sustain the ponies’ presence on the moor “for generations to come,” but opponents argue that the new agri-environmental schemes are not adequately accounting for the ponies’ ecological value.

The agency’s recent livestock count initiatives, part of broader moorland conservation programs, have been criticized for their potential to cut numbers by as much as 56% to 89%. Campaigners point out that previous reductions in grazing, which the ponies were shielded from, failed to improve biodiversity on Dartmoor. Joss Hibbs, secretary of the DHPA, emphasized that the ponies are essential for managing the dominant “monoculture” of Molinia grass, a vegetation type that has spread across the moorlands. “Without them, the landscape will suffer,” Hibbs said, underscoring the ponies’ role as the most effective grazers for this grass species.

Commoners’ Dilemma

The conflict also pits commoners against conservation goals, as they face the challenge of balancing economic survival with environmental stewardship. Under the current system, commoners have historically safeguarded the ponies, using them as a primary source of grazing for the moor. However, the new contracts may compel them to replace ponies with more profitable livestock, threatening both the ponies’ existence and the viability of their farms. Hibbs warned that this choice could lead to a “double-edged sword”: if commoners opt for commercial animals, the ponies may vanish; if they stick with ponies, their farms could collapse, leaving the animals vulnerable.

“Natural England’s approach will devastate the Dartmoor hill pony population, it will make farms financially unviable and it’s extremely doubtful there will be any environmental benefit,” Hibbs added in a statement. This tension reflects a broader struggle between conservation efforts and the practical needs of rural communities. The DHPA has called for a moor-wide agreement on herd size, similar to the previous contracts, to ensure the ponies are not disproportionately affected.

Government Defends Its Position

A Downing Street spokeswoman defended the government’s stance, stating that the cull is not an official recommendation and that the country does not typically manage feral pony populations through culling. She emphasized the ponies’ “vital role in the health of its moorland habitats” and their importance as part of the “cultural landscape.” The government has also expressed confidence that the ponies are safe under its policies, with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) spokesperson noting that the decision aligns with the recommendations of a 2023 government-commissioned review.

DEFRA’s spokesperson added: “In line with the Independent Review of Protected Site Management on Dartmoor, we are working with partners, including the Dartmoor Hill Pony Association, to help ensure that we maintain numbers of semi-wild ponies on the moor for generations to come.” This statement aims to reassure the public that the culling is not a given, but the debate continues over the effectiveness of the current strategy.

Call for Legal Protection and Further Review

Devon-based Friends of the Dartmoor Hill Pony charity has urged the government to provide long-term, legal safeguards for the remaining herds, emphasizing their rare status. The group also advocates for a moor-wide herd size agreement to prevent overgrazing and ensure a stable population. Additionally, campaigners are pushing for the outcomes of the Land Use Management Group to be considered before finalizing any culling decisions. This group, tasked with implementing the 2023 review’s recommendations, is expected to complete its land use plan by 2027.

The controversy underscores the complexity of managing Dartmoor’s ecosystem, where grazing patterns directly influence biodiversity. While the government insists on protecting the ponies, the debate over their survival remains unresolved. As the situation develops, stakeholders across the political spectrum are watching closely, with the Conservatives leading the charge to ensure the ponies are not subjected to mass culling. The outcome of this dispute could set a precedent for how conservation and local livelihoods are balanced in the future.

Broader Implications for Conservation

The dispute over Dartmoor hill ponies has broader implications for conservation policies in the UK, raising questions about the role of government agencies and the impact of financial incentives on wildlife management. By tying grazing rights to agri-environmental schemes, Natural England is attempting to align land use with ecological benefits. However, critics argue that this approach fails to recognize the ponies’ unique contribution to the moorland’s biodiversity.

As the Land Use Management Group prepares its report, the pressure on the government to make a decisive statement grows. The debate highlights the need for a nuanced strategy that protects endangered species while supporting the economic needs of those who care for them. For now, the future of the Dartmoor hill ponies remains uncertain, with both sides presenting compelling arguments about the best path forward for the landscape and its inhabitants.

Follow BBC Devon on X, Facebook, and Instagram. Send your story ideas to spotlight@bbc.co.uk.