Former OpenAI Board Member Reveals Elon Musk’s Sperm Donation Offer

Former OpenAI board member says Elon – Shivon Zilis, a former board member of OpenAI, took the stand in a federal courtroom in Oakland, California, this week, shedding light on her unique connection to Elon Musk and the unexpected path that led to four of his children. Her testimony became a focal point in Musk’s legal battle to reverse OpenAI’s transformation into a for-profit entity, revealing personal details that intertwined her professional role with Musk’s private proposals.

The Unconventional Relationship and Legal Testimony

Zilis, who served as a director at OpenAI from 2020 to 2023, described how her relationship with Musk began years before the corporate shift. While her primary involvement with the AI company was as an advisor, she recounted a deeper personal bond with Musk that evolved over time. According to her, the idea of having children with Musk originated during a period when he was actively encouraging others to start families, noting that she had not yet done so.

“I still really wanted to be a mum, and Elon made the offer around that time, and I accepted,” Zilis stated, explaining that Musk had proposed to donate sperm in 2020. She added, “He was encouraging everyone around him at that time to have kids and had noticed I did not. He offered to make a donation.”

Zilis’s professional history with Musk spans multiple ventures, including her work as a venture capitalist in Silicon Valley for over a decade. She held executive roles at Tesla, where she contributed to the electric car company’s growth, and Neuralink, Musk’s neurotechnology firm. This experience likely influenced her perspective on Musk’s ambitions for OpenAI. Her initial meeting with Musk occurred through her advisory role at OpenAI, which she joined shortly after its founding in 2016.

Confidentiality and Family Life

Despite her professional ties, Zilis emphasized that her relationship with Musk was not romantic in 2020 when the sperm donation offer was made. She explained that the confidentiality agreement between herself and Musk was a key factor in her decision to keep their paternity arrangement private. This secrecy extended to her interactions with OpenAI’s leadership, including Sam Altman, who became the father of her twins in 2021.

“The confidentiality agreement with Musk is why I did not disclose to Sam Altman that the twins were fathered by him,” Zilis said. She revealed that she shared the news with Altman the following year, after a report by Business Insider hinted at Musk’s involvement in the children’s birth.

Zilis described her personal journey as one of adapting to new circumstances. She had been dealing with health challenges that altered her plans to follow a more traditional path of marriage and parenthood. “I had been struggling with certain health issues, which changed my initial approach to family life,” she testified. This shift, she claimed, led her to consider Musk’s offer as a way to fulfill her desire to become a mother without waiting for a romantic partner.

Initially, Zilis envisioned Musk’s role in the lives of her first two children as more symbolic than active. “The two had agreed to keep his paternity strictly confidential,” she said, highlighting the mutual understanding that Musk would not be publicly acknowledged as a parent. However, over time, Musk became a more active figure in their family life, spending a few hours each week with them. This growing involvement added a new layer to their relationship, which Zilis described as a blend of professional collaboration and personal connection.

Corporate Structure and Musk’s Influence

The legal proceedings also delved into the broader context of OpenAI’s corporate evolution. Zilis’s testimony was used by OpenAI’s lawyers to illustrate the internal dynamics that shaped the company’s transition from a non-profit to a for-profit model. Emails and text messages from her tenure as an advisor revealed Musk’s early interest in increasing his control over the organization. These documents showed that Musk advocated for additional board seats and even suggested integrating OpenAI into Tesla, possibly as a subsidiary.

“Such a move for OpenAI ‘solves the funding issue immediately,’ ” Zilis wrote in a court-exhibited email, underscoring Musk’s belief that greater control would secure the company’s financial future. This idea aligns with OpenAI’s need to raise billions from investors, a goal that became increasingly urgent as the organization expanded its research capabilities.

OpenAI’s legal team highlighted Musk’s role in shaping the company’s corporate structure. They pointed to conversations between Zilis, Altman, and Greg Brockman, OpenAI’s president, as evidence of Musk’s influence. Zilis’s involvement in these discussions, along with her access to sensitive information, positioned her as a pivotal figure in the company’s transformation. However, her personal ties to Musk also raised questions about potential conflicts of interest.

Brockman, when asked about Zilis’s continued presence on the board after Musk left the company in 2018, stated that they trusted her to “keep the Elon conflict under control.” This comment suggests that the board believed Zilis could balance her professional responsibilities with her private relationship with Musk. Yet, as the trial progressed, tensions emerged over Musk’s influence on the company’s direction.

The Final Split and Legacy of the Testimony

Zilis left the OpenAI board in March 2023, coinciding with Musk’s launch of xAI, a rival AI venture competing directly with OpenAI. Her departure marked the end of a significant chapter in the company’s history, one that included both strategic decisions and personal milestones. The legal battle over OpenAI’s corporate structure has now included years of correspondence, with Zilis’s emails serving as key evidence in the dispute.

Despite the challenges, Zilis maintained a friendly relationship with Altman and Brockman until at least 2023. “The three remained friends until at least 2023,” she said, indicating that personal ties persisted even as professional ones dissolved. Her testimony provided a human perspective on the broader corporate conflict, blending the personal and the professional in a way that added emotional weight to the legal arguments.

OpenAI’s lawyers have used Zilis’s account to demonstrate how Musk’s presence shaped the company’s strategic goals. They argue that his push for a for-profit model, including the potential merger with Tesla, was critical in securing the resources needed for OpenAI’s growth. However, the board’s decision to prioritize independence from Musk has been central to the lawsuit, with Altman and Brockman insisting that Musk should not have control over OpenAI’s operations.

Zilis’s story underscores the intersection of personal and professional life in the high-stakes world of tech innovation. As the trial continues, her testimony serves as both a narrative of individual choice and a reflection of the broader tensions within OpenAI. Whether her actions were driven by ambition, necessity, or a unique bond with Musk, the court is now considering how these factors may have influenced the company’s path.

Outside the UK? Sign up here for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world’s top tech stories and trends.