The law sets a 60-day limit on unauthorized wars. Will Trump respect it?

A preview of this story was featured in CNN’s What Matters newsletter. To receive it in your inbox, sign up for free here.

War Powers Act’s timeline and key provisions

Post-Vietnam legislation introduced a 60-day countdown for military actions initiated without congressional approval. The conflict with Iran, which the Trump administration launched without prior congressional consent, is set to reach this 60-day threshold on May 1, according to the War Powers Resolution’s text. However, the next steps remain uncertain.

Phases of the War Powers Resolution

The law outlines a three-part process for undeclared military operations. Initially, the president must inform Congress within 48 hours of deploying forces into hostilities, detailing the mission’s scope, rationale, and expected duration. Second, Congress has 60 days to approve the action or the president must terminate it. A third phase allows for an additional 30 days if the administration claims continued operations are necessary to secure troops during withdrawal.

Deadline debate in Congress

There is confusion over when the 60-day clock began, with legal interpretations splitting between two dates. Some argue it started when hostilities began, placing the deadline at April 29, while others base it on the White House’s official notification to Congress, suggesting May 1 as the cutoff. Certain Republican lawmakers believe the ceasefire period should not count toward the timeline, and even some Democrats question whether it could disrupt the schedule.

Trump’s position and potential actions

Trump has stated he will not expedite a deal to end the Iran war, fearing a poor outcome. The law’s constitutionality is also contested by multiple administrations, including Trump’s, who argue it limits executive power. Despite this, the law has never been invoked to halt a military operation, and courts have not ruled on its validity. Previous presidents found workarounds to extend their actions beyond the 60-day limit, but the scale of the US-Israel conflict in Iran is unprecedented, as noted by the National Constitution Center and Congressional Research Service.

Political dynamics and congressional response

While Democratic attempts to revoke Trump’s war powers have stalled, some Republican senators, like Lisa Murkowski, have proposed measures to impose constraints on the conflict. However, the White House has not sought public backing on Capitol Hill, a contrast to prior administrations. GOP Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, for instance, emphasized the need for dialogue, saying,

“You can’t punish ceasefires. We want them to sit down and talk to each other.”

He indicated readiness to push for a vote on the War Powers Act once the ceasefire concludes.

Historical precedents and legal challenges

Reagan bypassed a constitutional clash with Congress in 1983 by negotiating an agreement, avoiding the law’s requirements. Similarly, a resolution targeting Trump’s power in Venezuela was defeated in the Senate due to JD Vance’s tie-breaking vote. Yet Vance previously claimed the War Powers Resolution would not alter Trump’s foreign policy approach, stating,

“The War Powers Act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law. It’s not going to change anything about how we conduct foreign policy over the next couple of weeks, the next couple of months. And that will continue to be how we approach things.”